Thursday, April 16, 2015

Paving the Way For the U.N. Small Arms Treaty……….David Risselada


un-small-arms-treaty-draft picture
In October of 2013, American patriots let out a sigh of relief as the United States Senate authored a letter stating that the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty would be dead on arrival. While many people believe that the U.N. treaty would have little effect on law abiding American gun owners, the truth is the exact opposite. Language in the treaty gives the U.N. explicit authority in determining who is, or who isn’t, considered an “authorized recipient” of firearms.  The treasonous treaty also gives the U.N. the authority to disarm “hostile” populations in time of conflict. I have written many articles describing my belief that the Obama Administration is using the issue of race to push the country into a period of severe civil unrest; thus justifying the implementation of the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty. Looking at the current state of the nation it is difficult to come to any other conclusion. Over the past several months we have seen the Department of Justice intentionally create an atmosphere of hostility towards the police. I argued in my article “Using the Hegelian dialectic to Push For a National Police Force,” that this was being done to disarm the police in accordance with public law 87-297, The Arms Control And Disarmament act. While this law focused on disarming the military and then the public, I believe the same strategy is being implemented with the current “anti police” attitude.
In 2013 gun owners believed we were safe because there were enough senators on both sides of the political spectrum vowing to vote against the U.N. gun grabbing scheme. After all, according to the constitution there is a two thirds majority vote required to ratify any treaty. Unfortunately, this has all changed as we witnessed the Republican controlled senate surrender its power to Obama, again.  Instead of standing on principle and representing their constituents over the Iran nuclear deal, the traitorous Republicans caved to Obama and essentially re-wrote the treaty provisions found in the constitution. Under this deal the Senate would be required to over ride the president’s veto power with 67 votes as opposed to having the power to vote up or down on a treaty with the two thirds rule. This puts all of the power into the hands of the president as there are surely enough liberal Democrats that would prevent the 67 vote over ride.
Many people may be wondering what this has to do with the small arms treaty; they are after all two separate issues. This may be true; however, there is an element of conditioning taking place here. Over the past several years we have watched the U.S. Senate change its own rules in order to achieve their objectives. We have watched as the hard left has waged a relentless humiliation campaign aimed at Republicans that oppose their agenda. This tactic has wielded enormous success as we have watched the Republicans capitulate on nearly every agenda item of the Democrats.
Un treaty&guns
It’s almost as if the Republicans are working in coordination with the Democrats to bring about the destruction of the United States. Many people are convinced that we are living under the iron fisted rule of a one party system, and that what we witness day in and day out is nothing more than “political theatre” designed to keep us either distracted, or diametrically opposed to one another.  Take Ted Cruz for example. This week he made waves among the conservative base as he stood in defense of the second amendment and its intended purpose to protect us from government tyranny. It was a great speech that left many hoping he can become the Republican nominee. Doesn’t anyone else wonder why he gave this speech the same week the senate surrendered their treaty powers to the president? Think about it a moment. Ted Cruz’s speech kept many people distracted from what was going on behind the scenes, and in the event he is unable to protect your gun rights he will simply blame everything on the other Republicans who didn’t stand on principle. While this may make some people angry, it certainly isn’t outside the realm of possibility, it’s how the game is played.  Republicans and Democrats act like they hate each other for the camera, and then have a beer after work.
As far as the Arms Trade Treaty is concerned; I’m afraid that this Iran deal may have set a new precedent on how treaties are handled. The truth is that this deal isn’t even an actual treaty. This makes it even more frightening because you would think the Republicans would have been able to prevent its implementation because the President has no constitutional authority to make deals of this kind. Instead, what they have done is surrender their actual treaty power to work a deal that wasn’t a treaty in the first place, but should have been.  Now there is nothing stopping Obama from demanding these same rules apply to any other treaty that comes up. Do you honestly think they will muster enough courage to stand just because it’s the second amendment? The red line was crossed long ago.

Wednesday, April 8, 2015

Islam and the Left: United Against Christians by Erik Rush




“If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you.”
– John 15:18-19 (NIV)
We are living in a time when the government, press and entertainment media tell us that our economy is on the rebound, Obamacare is facilitating health care for millions more Americans than before its implementation, unemployment has plummeted, and the Islamic Republic of Iran has apparently become America’s ally. So I suppose it should be no surprise that we’re also being told there is nothing at all sinister in the myriad anti-Christian exertions on the part of certain political factions, and that there certainly isn’t any “war on Christianity” going on.
Apart from recognizing that there is emergent and coordinated antipathy toward Christians in America, it is of paramount importance to understand some of the universal mechanisms behind the misrepresentations (or lies) I listed, because this will not only facilitate combating these mechanisms, but could serve to rally the troops, as American Christians come to comprehend the level of abject evil within our government and other institutions.
Last week in this space, I described how the political left has advanced a phony “gay rights” agenda, which in reality is calculated to demoralize Americans at large and coalesce political power – that of the left, not homosexuals. Neutralizing the moral anchor of Christianity is essential to this objective, so homosexual activists have been given the latitude to designate as “discrimination” essentially any speech or practice on the part of Christians they choose to condemn.
As ironic as this sounds, America’s enemies have made great use of our Constitution itself as a weapon against liberty. From flag-burning to adopting Marxist principles into our political process, leftists have routinely cited the Freedom of Speech and Equal Protection clauses as explicit license for all manner of permissible and imposed cultural subversion.
As more activist jurists took to the federal bench, civil rulings increasingly tended to favor leftist policy. This is one reason states such as Indiana found it necessary to pass legislation in the vein of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, despite guarantees of religious freedom in the Bill of Rights. We have reached a point where the affronts against religious liberty by government have become so common, people perceive few alternatives. There oughtta be a law …
Well, now they have one. It’s redundant, but these are the fruits of our ongoing neglect of civic issues.
Earlier, WND reported on the case of a judge in the United Kingdom who convicted a street evangelist for quoting Leviticus 20:13, which prescribes the death penalty for homosexuality. On April 2, former paratrooper-turned-Christian-evangelist Mike Overd was fined, as well as being ordered to pay court costs and compensation to the homosexual activist who lodged a complaint against him.
Understand leftists’ dedication to tyranny and tolerance of terror; read Jamie Glazov’s “United in Hate”
The presiding judge, Shamim Ahmed Qureshi of Bristol Crown Court, is a Muslim who serves with the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal, the overseer of the U.K.’s Shariah courts. So despite homosexuality being a capital crime under Shariah law, this supposedly observant Muslim judge was happy to persecute a Christian in the realm of secular law for an alleged slight against homosexuals.
The alliance between leftists and Muslims against Christians may be more apparent in Britain than it is in America, since the process has advanced much further in the U.K. – but not to worry; President Barack Hussein Obama has been moving the course of Islamist infiltration handily along.
This week, The Hill reported that Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., had introduced a federal “firearms buyback” bill. The “Support Assault Firearm Elimination and Education of our (SAFER) Streets Act” would provide America’s more gullible gun owners with the “incentive” to turn firearms in to local law enforcement. It’s supposed to make the streets safe from all of the law-abiding gun owners who run around randomly shooting people, I guess.
DeLauro, a far left lawmaker, had not only other uber-progressive and socialist Congress creatures co-sponsoring the bill, but Muslim Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., as well.
“This should come as no surprise,” wrote Tim Brown at Sons of Liberty Media, “since we know there are many Muslim Brotherhood front groups working in America to undermine the ability of Americans to keep and bear arms.”
Many have asked how those on the far left and Islamists plan to co-exist once they have done away with America’s Christians, the Constitution and the republic. Perhaps they do not plan to co-exist at all, each group believing that they will ultimately overcome the other. Maybe both groups suppose that the pre-eminence of either is immaterial so long as America has been laid waste.
I haven’t settled on a plausible answer to this question, but I do know that once they have done away with America’s Christians, the Constitution and the republic, it probably won’t matter too much to you and me who winds up in charge.
Source www.wnd.com
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/04/islam-and-the-left-united-against-christians/#sr8vB0MFadDo2djB.99

Tuesday, April 7, 2015

White Privilege, Religious Liberty and Leftist lies.........David R.

lies
Sometimes it’s difficult to determine whether the left should be feared, or mocked.  There is no arguing that they are engaged in a diabolical agenda, absent of any “recognizable morality.” It is also equally apparent that they get so wrapped up in their lies that they can’t keep up with them. They desperately try to keep their narrative going, while the majority of us think of them as fools who will sell their own souls for the slightest gain of power.  The latest example of this is the “Religion Expression” law generating so much controversy. In typical left wing fashion, the radical zealots are attempting to convince the masses that this bill is all about “rightwing oppression” of gays; when in fact, it is nothing of the sort. According to Mark Levin, it merely gives a religious person the right to protect their beliefs, and argue for them in a court of law. I would also argue that these rights and protections would extend to all religious peoples. I would even go one step further and say that gay people should not be forced to engage in any business practices that violate their personal code of morality as well. This isn't the point of the article though. The point is how the left will double down on their own lies in light of the fact they have been exposed as liars. Which in the eyes of those who strive to live a wholesome life, makes them look even more diabolical.
obama pinnochio
Ever since this debacle began we have been educated about the origins of the “Religious Freedom Restoration Act,” and how it was originally introduced by the same Democrats who now describe it as a vehicle of oppression. Introduced in 1993 by Chuck Schumer, and signed into law by Bill Clinton, the bill passed a voice vote by ninety seven senators showing that one time, religious liberty meant something in America; even to Democrats. The truth is that Democrats and their “Progressive Republican” counterparts will go whatever direction needed to gain the most power. It served their interests back then to back religious liberty; now, it serves them to eviscerate it. The audacity, let alone the utter hypocrisy of these people to go on pretending we are too stupid to figure this out is astonishing. The sad reality is that many of us simply don’t know how to fight back. This is why they are able to get away with so many lies; because they are counting on the public being too distracted and too ignorant to take a stand.
The big lie that they continue to get away with today, which is causing a great deal of racial strife in America, is white privilege. This backwards ideology, which justifies reverse racism based on revisionist history, has now made its way in to the U.S. military. Soldiers, working under Obama and commanders who are becoming increasingly hostile to the Judeo-Christian worldview mind you, are being indoctrinated into this asinine way of thinking.  This is a another example of an ideology that actually works against the left as any person with a brain can quickly decipher that they believe black people are not as good a white people. Consider this quote from the presentation.
“[R]ace privilege gives whites little reason to pay a lot of attention to African Americans or to how white privilege affects them.” It adds, quoting, “To be white in American [sic] means not having to think about it.”
Is there something wrong with being black? That is the impression I am left with as I read this quote. It’s as if the left believes their own fables of being privileged because they actually look down on black people.  They are saying that we are too wrapped up in our own privileged lives, and we are too accustomed to society working to our own exclusive benefit, that we don’t see how the black man is suffering.  Why is the black man suffering? Failed socialist policies instituted by liberal democrats mostly, along with lies of victomology and race baiting community organizers. It makes a lot of sense if you think about it. The left believes in evolution, not God. Therefore; they believe in the survival of the fittest mentality which means they believe that the white man is a higher evolved form of “human being.” This leaves them looking at blacks as a social group who can’t survive without their help. If they didn't believe this then why do they push the need for welfare and wealth distribution? Why do they push the victimization mindset instead of teaching them how to succeed? The followers of the left will never understand that it was the welfare state mentality, and the continuation of “racial identity politics” that has destroyed the black population, not capitalism. This is why they push the white privilege narrative so hard, they are trying to project their failures and prejudices upon the rest of society while completely ignoring the consequences. The hard left on the other hand, know exactly what they are doing as they feverishly work to widen the racial divide.
America is at a cross roads. We are being governed by clowns, who when given a close examination, are the ones that don’t have a leg stand on in any position they take.  They have proven over and over again that they will tell any lie with the belief that its propagation will set it in the minds of Americans as reality, as opposed to the non sense it is. We know that they operate from an “ends justify the means” position, and that morality is just another mean in which they will abuse to reach their end goal. Remember what Alinsky said about morals.
“To say that corrupt means corrupt the ends is to believe in the immaculate conception of ends and principles. The real arena is corrupt and bloody.” Rules for Radicals pp. 24

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

The Privilege of Institutionalized Racism.......A Commentary by David Risselada

whitey
The left is truly relentless, especially when pushing their race based agenda.  It doesn’t matter how many times their claims of racism prove to be fallacious, they continue to double down with their “white privilege” narrative paying no attention to the damage they cause. The most recent example of this is Eric Holder’s renewed focus on the Ferguson Police Department. After admitting that Darren Wilson was innocent, and there was no evidence that he was motivated by bigotry, Holder focused his efforts on the department desperately looking for signs of “institutional” racism. The term racism itself has become an explosive, politically charged word that has been re-defined to meet whatever definition the professional left needs. The definition has taken a dangerous turn, and now serves to justify any and all violent behavior committed by black people. Racism was once defined as having hatred toward another group of human beings simply because they are a different race. In the hands of the radical left, it now means something completely different. Believing that black people are equal with white people and that they are capable of living independent lives seems to be the left’s revised definition. In other words, not towing the line of “black victimization” is what the left now considers racist.
For far too long we have been forced to endure a hostile narrative that blames white people for all the problems blacks and other minorities allegedly face. (Don’t forget, you are not allowed to pay attention to successful blacks who tend to be conservatives.) We are told that black people cannot be racist because they do not have the “institutional power” to discriminate. This concept can be traced back to “Black Liberation Theology,” which was founded by the Marxist Reverend, James Cone.  It can also be traced back to the century old plan to change America’s culture put forth by Antonio Gramsci. Working from Marx’s theory of the oppressor and the oppressed, Gramsci categorized the oppressed into different groups that went well beyond the idea of those “being exploited by the capitalists.” He essentially turned all social groups into people being oppressed by the dominant social group. In America, the claim is that white people dominate the culture; so therefore, all minority groups are being oppressed by whites because the society has been set up specifically for their benefit.  This is where the whole idea of white privilege came from. It literally is a plan designed to overthrow the existing culture with the intent of establishing a Marxist dictatorship.
There is no institutional power greater than being able to hide behind the color of your skin, under some false pretense of civil rights. To claim that black people do not have any “institutional power” is beyond absurd.  Likewise, to suggest blacks can’t be racist is equally absurd. Every social group in America is legally protected by some form of hate crime legislation except for white people. Yet, they argue that it is white’s who are protected by the privilege of having institutional power.  The protestors in Ferguson, after destroying the city in a fit of rage based on lies, were awarded huge sums of money because the police used tear gas in an attempt to save lives and property.  Eric Holder and Barrack Obama have been exposed as being race baiting opportunists who instigated the whole Ferguson incident, and yet they face no consequences whatsoever because people are afraid to offend them. Police in New York have been forced into a box, psychologically disarmed, and told they need to be friendlier to criminals. This appeasement policy, along with the constant race baiting of the radicals in charge has resulted in another shooting of a New York police officer. Through propaganda and reverse psychology, the left has the audacity to continue to blame police officers for being racist while claiming that black people have no institutional power.
The truth is that these policies and attitudes have done far more to harm the black community than help. Through the constant victimization, blacks in America have been able to justify an entitlement mentality, and their violence against white people. The left likes to use statistics that show how blacks live in poverty at a higher rate than is “proportional” to their population. That may be true; however, it is also true that they commit crimes that tend be race based, at a rate that is also disproportional to their percentage of the population. Hovering right below the surface is the ugly truth that the Democrats go to great lengths to hide. It has been the promotion of their welfare state mentality that has created the dependency mindset among blacks. What this has resulted in is the breakdown of the black family, destruction of personal initiative, and in recent events the creation of murderers due to the machinations of “race baiters” with a political agenda. When you look at from this perspective I guess it would be safe to say that black people’s problems are white people’s fault; white guilt ridden leftists that is.
We are facing some perilous times. The sooner the American people realize that we are being intentionally divided to keep us from uniting, the better. This is not likely to happen however; the wounds of racial bigotry are being salted by the very people who caused them.  Even as we speak, we are watching the very same tactic repeat itself with the thousands of people being funneled into the United States. They are nothing but a new voting base for the Democrats, and the black population is so focused on “white racism” they fail to see how letting all these people in will hurt them the worst.  This is what happens when we let politicians appeal to our lower natures, we become ensnared in an inescapable trap, looking to the very institutions that have enslaved us with the expectation of freedom. While the left plays its games, creating enemies that don’t exist, they have become the true power behind the institutions as they socially engineer society to their twisted, racist vision.

Thursday, March 19, 2015

The High Cost of Treason Part Two.....David Risselada

In my article, The High Cost of Treason, I discussed the fallacious claims made by Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT.) In what could best be described as an all out assault on law abiding gun owners, he viciously attacked those in possession of the so called “high capacity” magazine, by suggesting they are “arming against the government.” This goes right along with efforts made by our federal government to label patriots as “threats” while trying to appease our real enemies. There is something disturbing about a government that doesn't trust its own people to keep and bear arms, especially while ignoring the threats being made against us by those who commit violent acts in the name of their religion.  You see, the Democrats go to great lengths to make excuses for Islamic terrorism by claiming they are oppressed victims. They suggest that we should try to “empathize” with their worldview and understand what drives them to commit the atrocities they do. They ignore the fact that there is a literal genocide being committed against Christians, and they have the audacity to label hard working Americans as terrorists, and a threat to national security because we believe in the constitution.  It’s no wonder Senator Murphy (D-CT) is concerned, the acts of this government are downright treasonous. Unfortunately, the treason doesn't stop there.
Sen. Chris Murphy represents the third type of "stupid" person in America today.
Claims people with high capacity magazines are "arming against the government."
Recently the unconstitutional ATF was considering a ban on 5.56, green tip ball ammo. Using the typical “Alinsky style” tactics, they claimed there was a need to ban the popular cartridge to make the police safer.  It is truly ironic, because the only danger the police are currently in, is from the thugs that the Obama administration had “organized into action” in response to the Ferguson incident.  Let’s not forget that the biggest job of a community organizer is to stir up hate and discontent.  After receiving nearly 100,000 letters and comments, including claims by police that not one green tip had been used against them, the ATF backed off the ban. It was only a week before another Democrat congressman, Steve Israel of New York, introduced legislation to ban all rifle ammunition in the name of police safety.  To sum this up, the government is seeking to disarm the population based on the false premise of racism, and a danger posed to the police by those in possession of rifle ammunition. It’s no wonder they are scared of us, they are using lies to steal our liberties.
ATF-ammo-ban
While the Obama administration worked feverishly to incite it’s much desired race war, they were also going to great lengths to militarize the police. Police stations across the country, including the Ferguson Police Department, have received high grade military equipment from the pentagon under a Department Of Defense program called 1033. In what can best be described as an application of the Hegelian Dialectic (problem, reaction, solution) strategy, the federal government has been arming local police forces to the teeth, in anticipation of the potential problems it may cause. They then sweep in and offer their communistic, utopian solutions in the form of a federally controlled police force.  This is outright treason as the constitution gives absolutely no authority to the executive branch to create such a force. History shows that when a dictator assumes this kind of power the results are disastrous; all out totalitarianism is sure to follow. Given the fact that the National Defense Act of 2011 gives the military the right to detain anyone indefinitely, and that the Posse Comitatus act has virtually been repealed, there is absolutely nothing protecting us from all out usurpation. It is becoming abundantly clear why the government does not trust its citizens with firearms, they are committing all out treason against the United States.
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
There is one more subject that needs to be discussed, and that is the rate at which Obama is firing top military generals that seem to be standing in the way of his agenda. There have been many reports suggesting that President Obama has asked military commanders if they were willing to fire upon American citizens who refused to surrender their firearms. While this claim remains controversial, the fact is that he has been firing many generals and replacing them with people more willing to remake the military in his image. Hardened war commanders have been replaced with radical feminists and homosexual activists more concerned about making a political statement than fighting the nation’s battles. As far as the litmus test goes, there is reason to believe it may be real. In 1994 at the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center in 29 palms California, a similar survey was given to marines.  This author was stationed in 29 Palms in 1995 and knew marines who had taken this survey. Many of the questions revolve around the attitudes of marines and their willingness to deploy on U.S. soil and work under the authority of the U.N. The most alarming question is the very last one in the survey that bears a chilling similarity to the question Obama has been allegedly asking.
The  U.S.  government declares a ban on   the possession,  sale, transportation, and transfer of all non-sporting firearms.  A thirty (30) day amnesty period is permitted for these firearms  to  be turned over to  the local authorities.  At the end of this period, a number of citizen groups refuse to  turn over their firearms. Consider the following statement:
I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government
(_____)(____)(_____)(______)(____)
Strongly disagreeDisagreeAgreeStrongly agreeNo opinion


Regrettably, service members who had less than 10 years of service time, and those who had just entered the service saw no problem with this order; 63% of them stated they would follow it. It was the older troops, those who had over 15 years of service that had resoundingly answered no. This was in 1994 my friends. Imagine what the numbers are now with the level of socialist indoctrination our younger generations have endured.
There are many that would call me a crazy conspiracy theorist for writing this article. I am not claiming that I know what is going to happen or when, if anything at all. I do know however, that our government has labeled the patriots of this nation as threats to national security and is ignoring the real threats we face. I know that radical Islam is on the move and the people we elected to preserve our constitution are working day and night to undermine it while inciting racial tensions, appeasing our enemies and attempting to limit our abilities to defend ourselves. I would like to think that these are issues that could unite all Americans into standing for liberty; unfortunately, they are not. It is evident however, that lawmakers on the left are hell bent on eliminating the second amendment. Their fear of an armed populace, in my humble opinion, is evidence of their treachery and treason against their country. If they were honest, and working to uphold and defend the constitution as they swore to do, what would they have to fear?

Thursday, March 5, 2015

The Deception Runs Deep.......David Risselada


mushroom cloud
Over the past several months I have focused on subjects dealing with the deception of communism. From the art of Psychopolitics to ideological subversion and demoralization, I have made every possible effort to demonstrate that the wool has been pulled over our eyes, and Barack Obama is not who he appears to be. In my article; Islam, Obama and the Communist Deception for example, I argue that President Obama may appear to be supporting Islam; however, he has another motive. I argued that his real beliefs rest with the mindset of communism and that ISIS is being used to achieve another end.  For those who understand the nature of the Hegelian Dialectic, it isn’t too difficult to conceive that the powers that be would deliberately allow ISIS to become an out of control threat so they would be forced to deal with them. This is the way communists operate. They create crisis after crisis, force a reaction out of the public, and then implement their “preexisting” solution. Americans can feel that there is a crisis on the horizon; however, many have no idea how deep the deception truly runs.
In the year 2000, a Washington based “Neocon” think tank called the Project for a New American Century published a white paper called “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century.” This would come to be known among conspiracy theorists as the document that laid out the plans to invade seven countries; Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Syria and finally Iran. The problem is that none of this is conspiracy theory, it is fact. These wars of conquest started with the “Pearl Harbor” event of our time, the September 11 attacks of 2001, where we responded with an invasion of Afghanistan. Since that time we have toppled the regimes of Iraq and Libya, and we are currently funding the so called “moderate rebels” in their efforts to bring down Syria. In other words, the plan outlined by PNAC is still well under way and is being conducted right under our noses without a peep from the public.
Another document has recently surfaced, (and for this I would like to thank Clyde Lewis from the Ground Zero radio program) describing a new plan to continue in their efforts to go after Iran. This paper was published by The Brookings Institute and it is called “Which Path to Persia.”The document is lengthy but it essentially details a deceptive plan to invade Iran and occupy the nation with U.S. ground troops. To accomplish this they are deliberately giving the illusion that Barack Obama and Benjamin Netanyahu are bitter rivals with completely different ideas on how to deal with Iran. Obama, in an effort to appease his voting base must remain committed to giving the appearance of pursuing peace. The truth is that Obama is carrying out the same plan laid out by the PNAC in 2000 and needs a different way to get a weary nation to accept war with Iran as being inevitable.  Mr. Lewis seemed to believe that the speech given by the Israeli Prime Minister was nothing but “theater” designed to get Iran to back off of Obama’s deal, and to get the world to accept an Israeli led strike with the support of the U.S.A. This is not outside the realm of possibility; after all, deception in the U.S. government runs treacherously deep.
The point of this article is not to do a policy analysis of “Which Path to Persia,” rather it is to discuss just how deep the deception truly runs and how they are able to pull this off.  Barack Obama was elected as literally the “antithesis” of an administration that many viewed as warmongers. Let’s face it; George W. Bush was a bumbling idiot who took us into a war with Iraq that was no more necessary than an invasion of Disney Land. Many people who fall for the false “right/left” paradigm may see things differently; however, this doesn’t change the fact that Obama was elected because he wasn’t George Bush. Let’s not forget the quote from Rules for Radicals-
“Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future.” (Dostoevski)
My writing partner, Fred Deruvo, has been writing an excellent series of articles on the emerging Technocracy, and how the Trilateral Commission has had its hands in the executive branch since its founding in 1976. Is it too hard to believe that perhaps George Bush’s job was to discredit America to the point where we felt hopeless? Is it possible that George Bush was deliberately paving the way for an election of another president that would carry out the same agenda with a different smile? I believe the answer to that question is yes through and through.  The evidence is indisputable; Barack Obama has carried on the same wars outlined in PNAC’s white paper, this is an inarguable fact. This is explains why Barack Obama continuously blames Bush for everything. He is working to conceal his real motives from his voting base that put him in power simply because of their seething hatred for Republicans. He has the help of the media and academia convincing the masses that Republicans are the embodiment of evil, and as a result he is able to carry out the same agenda without question.  Face it America; under Obama the poor are getting poorer and the rich keep getting richer, but because people believe he is adamantly opposed to Republicans they refuse to open their eyes and see him for what he is, a globalist working for the same elite that ordered George Bush to invade Iraq. Now, he is employing the same deceptive techniques perfected by the communists to convince you and me that he stands for peace, when in reality his aims are to topple Iran just as he did Libya, and as he is trying to do in Syria. The deception runs deep America, open your eyes.

Monday, February 23, 2015

Whose Fault Will It Be? A commentary by David Risselada

This is another one of those "I don't know what to say" moments. I hang my head in sorrow as I watch the circus that has become the United States march right into the ash heaps of history. We are at the exact same point of so many countries, whose leaders suddenly launched a full frontal assault against their own people! Yet, we fail to see it because the masters of propaganda have successfully subdued us. How in the world does a nation of free men become enslaved? "One step at a time, thats how. As surely as the earth rotates around the sun, we were slowly educated to believe the ideals we stood for, the values we believed in and the liberties our forefathers fought and died for, were wrong. We became a nation of racists, sexists and "Christian Fundamentalists" who were just as dangerous as Islamic terrorists because nobody wanted to "make a scene" and challenge the narrative. As surely as I sit here now and write, I will tell you I spent the past five years calling my senators and congressman, warning them of the dangers of "white privilege" education, and the extreme "Anti Americanism" being taught in our schools. My senators and congressmen are revered for being some of the most conservative in the nation, yet they did nothing to investigate my claims. Now, children are graduating these prestigious universities ready to embrace communism as a solution to the "fabricated problems caused by too much freedom," and these politicians, retiring on the fruits of our labor, sit idly by and have the nerve to act surprised at the state of our nation.
As the evil ideology  of radical Islam advances against us, we are beaten down by the antics of partisan politics, and the shenanigans of people who think they are fooling us. Democrats filibustered the DHS spending bill that would have fully funded DHS while simultaneously defunding Obama's amnesty. This tells the nation one thing for certain, Democrats do not care about you, or the lives you have worked so hard to build. As far as they're concerned, you stole it. Never mind the fact that they lie, cheat and steal for a living  while being paid by the very money that you work for, that's irrelevant. This filibuster, and the argument to shut down DHS comes at a time when Somali Muslim terrorists are threatening to attack U.S. shopping centers. It's almost as if the Democrats are using this as leverage and will be more than ready to blame the Republicans for daring to shut down DHS in the event of an attack.  There seems to be one issue that no one is willing to address. Why is the funding of DHS even an issue when they insist that the biggest threat facing the nation comes from "right wing patriot groups" and not Islamic terrorists? This should immediately disqualify anyone who is serving in the halls of government. Then again, look at who is running DHS. America, military commanders are warning us that the highest levels of government have been infiltrated by the Muslim Brotherhood. Yet, it is military veterans, tea party groups and those believing in the ideals of the constitution that have been labeled as a threat.
Is this being done by a vicious group of fascists, hell bent on destroying America? Or idiotic, academic eggheads who think it isn't fair that Muslims are labeled as terrorists? Either way, it is empowering those seeking to kill you.
If all of this wasn't bad enough, Louis Gutierrez is threatening a "heightened level of militancy" by groups of illegals because a judge halted Obama's unconstitutional amnesty.  How is that no one in the congress, who claims to be a conservative anyway, is acting on this and calling him out? This man is threatening militant action in direct defiance of a court's ruling, and complete and utter silence is all you hear from those who claim to represent us. In the meantime, President Obama hosts a summit on violent extremism which opens with an Islamic prayer, is attended mostly by Muslims and excludes the head of the FBI. Cair praises a report released by DHS which sites the dangers posed by "right wing extremism," while Christians overseas continue to be beheaded and burned alive in the name of Islam. The Egyptian government is said to be filing official charges against Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton for their support of terrorist factions in the "Arab Spring," and yet our government is paralyzed in fear at the thought of being disliked by illegal immigrants; or being called a racist.
Our schools have become nothing more than soviet style indoctrination centers, designed to do little more than inundate your children with Anti American propaganda. They seek to take everything you ever tried to instill in your child and turn it upside down. They are turning our children into a nation of cowards that will know how to do little else except run to the government in time of crisis. We have become a society full of self loathing, lazy sycophants looking to do little more with their lives than saturate themselves with meaningless entertainment, which also fills their heads with communist propaganda. We truly have become the generation that will surrender essential liberty for security; and in true form, we will be left with neither.
Some of us however, see with crystal clarity where this is going. We have been the voice in the darkness trying to bring others to the light. We have faced ridicule, been shamed and ostracised. Some of us denied degrees. We cry into the night that we will not be silenced and we continue to speak against all odds, despite the overwhelming resistance which opposes us. We know what we face but we drive on with the belief that evil only succeeds because good men say nothing. We need more good men. We need to ask the question "whose fault will it be?" Obama's, for appeasing Islam and attempting to destroy the constitution, the Republicans who do nothing to stop him, or ours for not caring?
Well, would you look at that? I had plenty to say after all.....