Thursday, March 19, 2015

The High Cost of Treason Part Two.....David Risselada

In my article, The High Cost of Treason, I discussed the fallacious claims made by Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT.) In what could best be described as an all out assault on law abiding gun owners, he viciously attacked those in possession of the so called “high capacity” magazine, by suggesting they are “arming against the government.” This goes right along with efforts made by our federal government to label patriots as “threats” while trying to appease our real enemies. There is something disturbing about a government that doesn't trust its own people to keep and bear arms, especially while ignoring the threats being made against us by those who commit violent acts in the name of their religion.  You see, the Democrats go to great lengths to make excuses for Islamic terrorism by claiming they are oppressed victims. They suggest that we should try to “empathize” with their worldview and understand what drives them to commit the atrocities they do. They ignore the fact that there is a literal genocide being committed against Christians, and they have the audacity to label hard working Americans as terrorists, and a threat to national security because we believe in the constitution.  It’s no wonder Senator Murphy (D-CT) is concerned, the acts of this government are downright treasonous. Unfortunately, the treason doesn't stop there.
Sen. Chris Murphy represents the third type of "stupid" person in America today.
Claims people with high capacity magazines are "arming against the government."
Recently the unconstitutional ATF was considering a ban on 5.56, green tip ball ammo. Using the typical “Alinsky style” tactics, they claimed there was a need to ban the popular cartridge to make the police safer.  It is truly ironic, because the only danger the police are currently in, is from the thugs that the Obama administration had “organized into action” in response to the Ferguson incident.  Let’s not forget that the biggest job of a community organizer is to stir up hate and discontent.  After receiving nearly 100,000 letters and comments, including claims by police that not one green tip had been used against them, the ATF backed off the ban. It was only a week before another Democrat congressman, Steve Israel of New York, introduced legislation to ban all rifle ammunition in the name of police safety.  To sum this up, the government is seeking to disarm the population based on the false premise of racism, and a danger posed to the police by those in possession of rifle ammunition. It’s no wonder they are scared of us, they are using lies to steal our liberties.
ATF-ammo-ban
While the Obama administration worked feverishly to incite it’s much desired race war, they were also going to great lengths to militarize the police. Police stations across the country, including the Ferguson Police Department, have received high grade military equipment from the pentagon under a Department Of Defense program called 1033. In what can best be described as an application of the Hegelian Dialectic (problem, reaction, solution) strategy, the federal government has been arming local police forces to the teeth, in anticipation of the potential problems it may cause. They then sweep in and offer their communistic, utopian solutions in the form of a federally controlled police force.  This is outright treason as the constitution gives absolutely no authority to the executive branch to create such a force. History shows that when a dictator assumes this kind of power the results are disastrous; all out totalitarianism is sure to follow. Given the fact that the National Defense Act of 2011 gives the military the right to detain anyone indefinitely, and that the Posse Comitatus act has virtually been repealed, there is absolutely nothing protecting us from all out usurpation. It is becoming abundantly clear why the government does not trust its citizens with firearms, they are committing all out treason against the United States.
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
There is one more subject that needs to be discussed, and that is the rate at which Obama is firing top military generals that seem to be standing in the way of his agenda. There have been many reports suggesting that President Obama has asked military commanders if they were willing to fire upon American citizens who refused to surrender their firearms. While this claim remains controversial, the fact is that he has been firing many generals and replacing them with people more willing to remake the military in his image. Hardened war commanders have been replaced with radical feminists and homosexual activists more concerned about making a political statement than fighting the nation’s battles. As far as the litmus test goes, there is reason to believe it may be real. In 1994 at the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center in 29 palms California, a similar survey was given to marines.  This author was stationed in 29 Palms in 1995 and knew marines who had taken this survey. Many of the questions revolve around the attitudes of marines and their willingness to deploy on U.S. soil and work under the authority of the U.N. The most alarming question is the very last one in the survey that bears a chilling similarity to the question Obama has been allegedly asking.
The  U.S.  government declares a ban on   the possession,  sale, transportation, and transfer of all non-sporting firearms.  A thirty (30) day amnesty period is permitted for these firearms  to  be turned over to  the local authorities.  At the end of this period, a number of citizen groups refuse to  turn over their firearms. Consider the following statement:
I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government
(_____)(____)(_____)(______)(____)
Strongly disagreeDisagreeAgreeStrongly agreeNo opinion


Regrettably, service members who had less than 10 years of service time, and those who had just entered the service saw no problem with this order; 63% of them stated they would follow it. It was the older troops, those who had over 15 years of service that had resoundingly answered no. This was in 1994 my friends. Imagine what the numbers are now with the level of socialist indoctrination our younger generations have endured.
There are many that would call me a crazy conspiracy theorist for writing this article. I am not claiming that I know what is going to happen or when, if anything at all. I do know however, that our government has labeled the patriots of this nation as threats to national security and is ignoring the real threats we face. I know that radical Islam is on the move and the people we elected to preserve our constitution are working day and night to undermine it while inciting racial tensions, appeasing our enemies and attempting to limit our abilities to defend ourselves. I would like to think that these are issues that could unite all Americans into standing for liberty; unfortunately, they are not. It is evident however, that lawmakers on the left are hell bent on eliminating the second amendment. Their fear of an armed populace, in my humble opinion, is evidence of their treachery and treason against their country. If they were honest, and working to uphold and defend the constitution as they swore to do, what would they have to fear?

Thursday, March 5, 2015

The Deception Runs Deep.......David Risselada


mushroom cloud
Over the past several months I have focused on subjects dealing with the deception of communism. From the art of Psychopolitics to ideological subversion and demoralization, I have made every possible effort to demonstrate that the wool has been pulled over our eyes, and Barack Obama is not who he appears to be. In my article; Islam, Obama and the Communist Deception for example, I argue that President Obama may appear to be supporting Islam; however, he has another motive. I argued that his real beliefs rest with the mindset of communism and that ISIS is being used to achieve another end.  For those who understand the nature of the Hegelian Dialectic, it isn’t too difficult to conceive that the powers that be would deliberately allow ISIS to become an out of control threat so they would be forced to deal with them. This is the way communists operate. They create crisis after crisis, force a reaction out of the public, and then implement their “preexisting” solution. Americans can feel that there is a crisis on the horizon; however, many have no idea how deep the deception truly runs.
In the year 2000, a Washington based “Neocon” think tank called the Project for a New American Century published a white paper called “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century.” This would come to be known among conspiracy theorists as the document that laid out the plans to invade seven countries; Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Syria and finally Iran. The problem is that none of this is conspiracy theory, it is fact. These wars of conquest started with the “Pearl Harbor” event of our time, the September 11 attacks of 2001, where we responded with an invasion of Afghanistan. Since that time we have toppled the regimes of Iraq and Libya, and we are currently funding the so called “moderate rebels” in their efforts to bring down Syria. In other words, the plan outlined by PNAC is still well under way and is being conducted right under our noses without a peep from the public.
Another document has recently surfaced, (and for this I would like to thank Clyde Lewis from the Ground Zero radio program) describing a new plan to continue in their efforts to go after Iran. This paper was published by The Brookings Institute and it is called “Which Path to Persia.”The document is lengthy but it essentially details a deceptive plan to invade Iran and occupy the nation with U.S. ground troops. To accomplish this they are deliberately giving the illusion that Barack Obama and Benjamin Netanyahu are bitter rivals with completely different ideas on how to deal with Iran. Obama, in an effort to appease his voting base must remain committed to giving the appearance of pursuing peace. The truth is that Obama is carrying out the same plan laid out by the PNAC in 2000 and needs a different way to get a weary nation to accept war with Iran as being inevitable.  Mr. Lewis seemed to believe that the speech given by the Israeli Prime Minister was nothing but “theater” designed to get Iran to back off of Obama’s deal, and to get the world to accept an Israeli led strike with the support of the U.S.A. This is not outside the realm of possibility; after all, deception in the U.S. government runs treacherously deep.
The point of this article is not to do a policy analysis of “Which Path to Persia,” rather it is to discuss just how deep the deception truly runs and how they are able to pull this off.  Barack Obama was elected as literally the “antithesis” of an administration that many viewed as warmongers. Let’s face it; George W. Bush was a bumbling idiot who took us into a war with Iraq that was no more necessary than an invasion of Disney Land. Many people who fall for the false “right/left” paradigm may see things differently; however, this doesn’t change the fact that Obama was elected because he wasn’t George Bush. Let’s not forget the quote from Rules for Radicals-
“Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future.” (Dostoevski)
My writing partner, Fred Deruvo, has been writing an excellent series of articles on the emerging Technocracy, and how the Trilateral Commission has had its hands in the executive branch since its founding in 1976. Is it too hard to believe that perhaps George Bush’s job was to discredit America to the point where we felt hopeless? Is it possible that George Bush was deliberately paving the way for an election of another president that would carry out the same agenda with a different smile? I believe the answer to that question is yes through and through.  The evidence is indisputable; Barack Obama has carried on the same wars outlined in PNAC’s white paper, this is an inarguable fact. This is explains why Barack Obama continuously blames Bush for everything. He is working to conceal his real motives from his voting base that put him in power simply because of their seething hatred for Republicans. He has the help of the media and academia convincing the masses that Republicans are the embodiment of evil, and as a result he is able to carry out the same agenda without question.  Face it America; under Obama the poor are getting poorer and the rich keep getting richer, but because people believe he is adamantly opposed to Republicans they refuse to open their eyes and see him for what he is, a globalist working for the same elite that ordered George Bush to invade Iraq. Now, he is employing the same deceptive techniques perfected by the communists to convince you and me that he stands for peace, when in reality his aims are to topple Iran just as he did Libya, and as he is trying to do in Syria. The deception runs deep America, open your eyes.

Monday, February 23, 2015

Whose Fault Will It Be? A commentary by David Risselada

This is another one of those "I don't know what to say" moments. I hang my head in sorrow as I watch the circus that has become the United States march right into the ash heaps of history. We are at the exact same point of so many countries, whose leaders suddenly launched a full frontal assault against their own people! Yet, we fail to see it because the masters of propaganda have successfully subdued us. How in the world does a nation of free men become enslaved? "One step at a time, thats how. As surely as the earth rotates around the sun, we were slowly educated to believe the ideals we stood for, the values we believed in and the liberties our forefathers fought and died for, were wrong. We became a nation of racists, sexists and "Christian Fundamentalists" who were just as dangerous as Islamic terrorists because nobody wanted to "make a scene" and challenge the narrative. As surely as I sit here now and write, I will tell you I spent the past five years calling my senators and congressman, warning them of the dangers of "white privilege" education, and the extreme "Anti Americanism" being taught in our schools. My senators and congressmen are revered for being some of the most conservative in the nation, yet they did nothing to investigate my claims. Now, children are graduating these prestigious universities ready to embrace communism as a solution to the "fabricated problems caused by too much freedom," and these politicians, retiring on the fruits of our labor, sit idly by and have the nerve to act surprised at the state of our nation.
As the evil ideology  of radical Islam advances against us, we are beaten down by the antics of partisan politics, and the shenanigans of people who think they are fooling us. Democrats filibustered the DHS spending bill that would have fully funded DHS while simultaneously defunding Obama's amnesty. This tells the nation one thing for certain, Democrats do not care about you, or the lives you have worked so hard to build. As far as they're concerned, you stole it. Never mind the fact that they lie, cheat and steal for a living  while being paid by the very money that you work for, that's irrelevant. This filibuster, and the argument to shut down DHS comes at a time when Somali Muslim terrorists are threatening to attack U.S. shopping centers. It's almost as if the Democrats are using this as leverage and will be more than ready to blame the Republicans for daring to shut down DHS in the event of an attack.  There seems to be one issue that no one is willing to address. Why is the funding of DHS even an issue when they insist that the biggest threat facing the nation comes from "right wing patriot groups" and not Islamic terrorists? This should immediately disqualify anyone who is serving in the halls of government. Then again, look at who is running DHS. America, military commanders are warning us that the highest levels of government have been infiltrated by the Muslim Brotherhood. Yet, it is military veterans, tea party groups and those believing in the ideals of the constitution that have been labeled as a threat.
Is this being done by a vicious group of fascists, hell bent on destroying America? Or idiotic, academic eggheads who think it isn't fair that Muslims are labeled as terrorists? Either way, it is empowering those seeking to kill you.
If all of this wasn't bad enough, Louis Gutierrez is threatening a "heightened level of militancy" by groups of illegals because a judge halted Obama's unconstitutional amnesty.  How is that no one in the congress, who claims to be a conservative anyway, is acting on this and calling him out? This man is threatening militant action in direct defiance of a court's ruling, and complete and utter silence is all you hear from those who claim to represent us. In the meantime, President Obama hosts a summit on violent extremism which opens with an Islamic prayer, is attended mostly by Muslims and excludes the head of the FBI. Cair praises a report released by DHS which sites the dangers posed by "right wing extremism," while Christians overseas continue to be beheaded and burned alive in the name of Islam. The Egyptian government is said to be filing official charges against Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton for their support of terrorist factions in the "Arab Spring," and yet our government is paralyzed in fear at the thought of being disliked by illegal immigrants; or being called a racist.
Our schools have become nothing more than soviet style indoctrination centers, designed to do little more than inundate your children with Anti American propaganda. They seek to take everything you ever tried to instill in your child and turn it upside down. They are turning our children into a nation of cowards that will know how to do little else except run to the government in time of crisis. We have become a society full of self loathing, lazy sycophants looking to do little more with their lives than saturate themselves with meaningless entertainment, which also fills their heads with communist propaganda. We truly have become the generation that will surrender essential liberty for security; and in true form, we will be left with neither.
Some of us however, see with crystal clarity where this is going. We have been the voice in the darkness trying to bring others to the light. We have faced ridicule, been shamed and ostracised. Some of us denied degrees. We cry into the night that we will not be silenced and we continue to speak against all odds, despite the overwhelming resistance which opposes us. We know what we face but we drive on with the belief that evil only succeeds because good men say nothing. We need more good men. We need to ask the question "whose fault will it be?" Obama's, for appeasing Islam and attempting to destroy the constitution, the Republicans who do nothing to stop him, or ours for not caring?
Well, would you look at that? I had plenty to say after all.....

Thursday, February 19, 2015

The Demoralization of Christians..........Radical Conservative

I have written several articles expressing my belief that President Obama is in fact a communist, not a Muslim. While it would certainly appear on the surface that his loyalty lies with Islam, I believe his real intention is the destruction of religion all together. Slowly but surely they are creating the necessary mental associations between Islam and Christianity. His goal is to convince you that Christians are just as likely to become radical extremists as Muslims are. Its all part of the agenda to demoralize America, destroy the system, and enable a new one to emerge. 





video

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

America, The Acts of Radical Jihadists Are Your Fault........The Radical Conservative

The left is so predictable. As the FCC vote concerning Net Neutrality approaches, it is very easy to take apart Marie Harf’s comments concerning “the root causes of terrorism.” First of all, we all know that when she said “combat” the root causes of terrorism, she meant attack American values of free speech and entrepreneurship. The left is actually running with the narrative that Islamic terrorism is our fault, and if we give up some of our liberties we will no longer offend them, and everyone will live happily ever after.  Every time a terrorist attack occurs, the narrative immediately focuses on the issue of “speech that could be deemed offensive.” Need you be reminded that they are feverishly trying to criminalize any criticism of Islam? This is all part of the agenda kill the first amendment and blame the actions of radical jihadists on America.
The ridiculous idea that radical jihadists will stop killing if they had a job springs from the lefts misguided notions of “social justice.” They would have us believe that the world is suffering in poverty solely because of America’s capitalist economic system. Never will they admit the utter failures of communism or socialism that are still plaguing many countries. Obama has even gone as far as saying that the radical jihadists have “legitimate grievances-”
“Governments that deny human rights play into the hands of extremists who claim that violence is the only way to achieve change. Efforts to counter violent extremism will only succeed if citizens can address legitimate grievances through the democratic process and express themselves through strong civil societies.”
What exactly is he saying here? This is coming from a man who has continuously treated the people he “presides over” like racists for disagreeing with him. This is coming from a man who as we speak, is seeking to deny us our rights to free speech, our right to defend ourselves and our right to the fruits of our labor. This is a government who has denied us our right to choose when it comes to healthcare. Not only is all of this true, he has also deemed America’s patriots to be a threat to national security. Let’s not forget that he and his “red brigades” (as Michael Savage likes to call them) deliberately attempted to ignite a racial war based on the false precepts of white police oppressing innocent blacks. They purposefully ignited the flames that led to literal war against the police based on lies. This is a direct violation of the human rights of those who have been made into murderers to push Obama’s racial agenda.  How is it that the Obama administration is not considered a terrorist organization?
You see, when Maria Harf made the comments concerning radical jihadists posting something on the internet, she wasn’t just referring to radical jihadists. She was referring to anyone posting anything that could offend someone. Specifically, anyone that offers criticism of Islam; mainly, she is referring to American Patriots. Remember the Muslim girl who accused a “man in a camouflage cap” of stalking her because she was Muslim? America, we are being set up on a grand scale. They are slowly pointing the guns in the war on terror on those who support the constitution.  While Islamic extremism is “justifiable” because of legitimate grievances, the possibility that we may respond to it, or criticize it will not be tolerated. Consider the presidents words for a moment.
By “violent extremism,” we don’t just mean the terrorists who are killing innocent people. We also mean the ideologies, the infrastructure of extremists –the propagandists, the recruiters, the funders who radicalize and recruit or incite people to violence. We all know there is no one profile of a violent extremist or terrorist, so there’s no way to predict who will become radicalized. Around the world, and here in the United States, inexcusable acts of violence have been committed against people of different faiths, by people of different faiths — which is, of course, a betrayal of all our faiths. It’s not unique to one group, or to one geography, or one period of time.
By this one statement alone it is crystal clear, President Obama (and his leftist administration) is planning on doing what leftists always do. They are going to censure us, and then they will start going after political dissidents, or anyone who is viewed as “stirring the pot.” This includes the Marxist idealists who have carried the agenda thus far. Let’s not forget what Yuri Bezmenov said-
‘Useful idiots’ the true believers of Marxism, according the KGB, would be executed to end the undermining of government. This means all activists, propagandists, Marxist revolutionaries, progressives / liberals…everyone on the “left” whose political ideology hangs on the tenets of socialism (communism) would be removed from influence.
Buckle up America, 2015 is shaping up to be a bumpy year. Perhaps it’s time to legitimize our grievances.

Monday, February 16, 2015

Muslims Play Civil Rights Game in America By David Risselada






Muslim Rights

While Americans have been shown numerous videos of radical Islamists beheading Christians and burning people alive, Muslims in America have the audacity to pretend they are “oppressed victims.” Guided by the master of Community organizing himself, Barack Hussein Obama, American Muslims are enjoying the protection of special class of people while they employ the same civil rights tactics used in the 1960’s. Just as the left wing narrative justifies black on white violence in Ferguson Mo. as being caused by“white privilege;” Muslims are getting away with playing the victim card while their brethren commit unspeakable atrocities. We are constantly beaten down with lectures about “multiculturalism” while being treated like bigots in our own land. To this day the so called “moderate” Muslim community has said little in regard to the horrific acts committed by ISIS. At the same time, we are supposed to be reflecting on how “freedom of speech” can be offensive, and might cause someone to commit murder because they have hurt feelings. This is truly the height of liberal idiocy.
We have seen with the developing Brian Williams story that there is little the left says that is based in truth.  Everything they say is designed to fit the “social change” narrative and regrettably, anything that pushes toward this end is justified. Even if the story is completely fabricated, the desired effect often ripples through society so by the time the truth is revealed it has little effect on the outcome. The left works tirelessly to present every social problem as being the fault of Americans, white people and Christians. This false perception has been pushed so hard that it is getting increasingly difficult to find someone who doesn’t believe that white Christians are the world’s oppressors, even though nothing could be further from the truth. When it comes to the agenda of social change however, the left has proven that there is no lie too big and no tale too tall. After all, let’s not forget that the ends justify the means.
There has been a series of fires at Mosques in America, and while there have been no definite conclusions, the left would love to blame right wing extremists. Just as they jumped to conclusions and blamed the murder of three Muslims students on right wingers, a crazed right wing lunatic setting mosques a blaze would serve the liberal narrative well. The only problem is that it generally isn’t right wingers that commit these types of violent acts. Just as the shooter of the three Muslim students turned out to be a leftist who hated religion, so were the other perpetrators of the recent mass shootings that have shaken the nation’s soul. Many people may have a hard time believing that the left would deliberately lie about discrimination in an effort to push an agenda; however, that appears to be exactly what is going on when it comes to the Muslim community.
The Washington Times reported on a story that demonstrates what lengths the left will go to push for “social change.” A young Muslim student at The University of Texas claimed that she was followed by a white man in a camouflage cap and held at gun point. She claims that she was specifically targeted because she was Muslim. Never mind the thousands of Christians brutally murdered by Muslims, she was being targeted by a white militant male and that is all that matters in multicultural America.  The only problem is she made it up. Notice though how she deliberately described a “white male in a camouflage cap?” They are attempting to portray the American patriot as the terrorist here and the Muslim as the oppressed victim. What makes it worse is that the University president, when interviewed, didn’t even acknowledge the fact she lied; rather he went on about the need to be cognizant of student safety. It’s as if the narrative of “white militant terrorists” truly is his main concern. This is what happens when your own government publishes a report citing you as a potential terrorist.
In another unbelievable example of leftwing deceit, Muslims deliberately filmed an incident with a fake police officer to cite discrimination against Muslims. They must have taken this directly from the Al Sharpton handbook.  First, the two Muslims were dressed as ordinary men engaging in some form of law breaking activity. The hired (fake) police officer was filmed ignoring them. They then changed their clothes and donned Muslim garb, the police officer was then filmed deliberately stopping them while they were engaged in the same activity. The point was to prove racial profiling. As is usually the case, the revelation of the truth bears little weight after the initial shock has worn off, the damage has been done.
America, this is all being done to show just cause for passing anti Islamic speech laws.  While Muslim extremists continue on their murderous genocide, the so called moderates are pushing their jihad by hiding behind America’s civil rights laws. Barrack Obama, a master manipulator and community organizer has all the necessary tools at his disposal to help accomplish this agenda. He also holds just the right amount of vitriol towards white America to have the nerve as well. Don’t doubt for a minute that Muslims wouldn’t burn their own mosques in order to push this agenda.

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Dialectical Materialism: Change through Opposing Views in Media........David Risselada


Marx-quote-dialectics
Most people understand the mainstream media has an “extreme” left wing bias, to say the least. The exposure of Brian Williams’ “Iraq war” lie should be enough to discredit any left wing news organization, as it seems everything they report is in fact, a severe misrepresentation of truth. Michael Savage, on his nightly radio program, was commenting on how this situation is likely to earn Williams more fame in the coming months, as the media will present him as a “lovable character” who can’t control himself. Given the nature of the left wing media, this would not be surprising. Whether this comes to pass or not is anybody’s guess. What people need to realize is that the nature of all media is manipulative, and serves an agenda of “social change.”  President Obama commented on a need to have a media that presents a common world view and common facts; however, the intent of having a right wing vs. a left wing media (Fox vs MSNBC) is to create the “necessary conflict” to bring about this common world view. This is called Dialectical Materialism, and it is the basis of Karl Marx’s theory of communism.
Dialectical Materialism is the belief that all positive change is the result of conflict. Based on Fredrich Hegel’s dialectic, (Hegelian Dialectic) it puts opposing viewpoints in direct conflict in order to control the outcome, with the goal of moving the narrative towards a socialisticworldview. So, while President Obama is claiming that Fox news is causing problems by preventing us from having a “common set of facts” to work with, the truth is that Fox news is serving its purpose and creating opposing views. Seeing as though Fox news has more reporters that lean to the left than any “left wing” organization has that lean to the right, it could be argued that Fox news in general is designed to change the attitudes of right wing viewers. Does anyone have another explanation why they appear to have taken a hard left turn? Let’s not forget that Rupert Murdoch donated more to Obama than he did to Mitt Romney in the 2012 elections. Also, while Fox News hosts such as Sean Hannity seem to be courageous enough to tell the truth about Islam and Sharia Law, it should be duly noted that one of thelargest shareholders of News Corp. is a Saudi Prince who is a die harder supporter of Sharia. (Michael Savage recently claimed that this individual has sold his shares.) These points alone, in the minds of independent thinkers, should be enough to prove the Dialectical Materialismtheory.
Just as is the case with other college programs such as social work and Psychology, the goal of journalism programs in American Universities is to create “change agents.” Rather than serving as institutions where students learn to seek truth and enlighten themselves, Universities have become indoctrination centers where students are inundated with the false belief that they need to be advocates for social justice. They are taught that the United States is an evil place, and that they need to dedicate themselves to social causes in order to create a “better world.” Consider the Journalism Program at Berkeley University. The class itself is called Journalism for Social Change, and teaches students that their goal as journalists is to work to make meaningful contributions to policy changes. Whatever happened to simply reporting the news? Consider the course description for a moment.
In a vibrant democracy, journalism and media have the power and responsibility to both inform and inspire the public to political action. Achieving this requires a deep understanding of current social problems and how policy is formulated, alongside the ability to tell that story in a manner that drives an otherwise apathetic public into action.
The goal of this online course is two-fold: 1) to teach students of journalism, public policy and social work how to use journalism and media as an implement of social change; and 2) have those students become effective change agents themselves. This class is not theoretical – students should be prepared to dig in deep and make meaningful contributions to policy change on both the state and federal level.
Looking at the underlined portions of this class description, it is clear that students are being indoctrinated to be more than news reporters. It could be argued that they are being trained as actors, trained to effectively manipulate the emotions of viewers so they can be “rallied to the cause.”  It’s almost like a practical application of community organizing-teaching people that they are oppressed in order to bring them to your side. Just as college and high school text books are filled with lies to taint the world view of students, the media misrepresents America and then offers a socialistic worldview as a viable solution.  The media itself is serving as a tool of “social change,” and the more we allow ourselves to be trapped in the false paradigm of “left vs. right wing” thinking, the easier we will be to manipulate.